fbpx
Economy

Economy (26)

To look cool, everyone talks about digital transformation without actually knowing what it really is. Some businesses are already reaping the benefits of digital transformation while others are still hesitant about investing in digital transformation.

If your organization belongs to the latter category then, this article will change your mind and convince you to say ‘yes’ to  digital transformation.

Enterprise digital transformation is not just about automating processes. There is much more to digital transformation than what most people might think. It also includes changing mindsets, goals and approaches.

Companies undergoing digital transformation knows that it takes time. If you are expecting to change everything overnight then, that is not going to happen.

When done correctly, digital transformation can:

  • Streamline processes
  • Boost efficiency
  • Improve customer satisfaction
  • Increase revenue

How can I digital transform my business the right way? To answer this question, here are some examples of successful brands who have not only completed transformation business process and are also reaping rich rewards. Follow in their footsteps to digitally transform your business.

In this article, you will learn about six inspirational examples of digital transformation companies that you can learn from.

6 Digital Transformation Examples

1. Nike

Famous for its sports shoes and clothing, Nike started to lose its luster. To turn things around, Nike decided to transform its brand and supply with the help of digital transformation and become a digital transformation company. Instead of selling their products through vendors, they decided to reach out to customers and sell to them directly. This shorten their development cycle and allowed them to launch new products quickly.

They created a new digital transformation strategy with Amazon. Soon, Nike started opening experience stores and focus on enhancing their app experience.

By harnessing the power of data analytics and connecting with their customers at a personal level, Nike succeeded in knowing their customers preferences and started recommending the right products. Nike’s revenue grew from $33.5 billion to $39.1 billion and its stock price jumped from $53 to $90 in less than two years.

2. Disney

Disney was falling behind the times, but they managed to turn the tables by acquiring few companies. Instead of developing their new streaming services, they purchased BAMTech to acquire streaming technology. Later, Disney invested heavily on marvel comics from 21st Century Fox, $52.4 billion to be exact. Next, Disney decided to connect directly with their customers. Due to this, they did not have to rely on distributors and advertisers.

They responded brilliantly by adapting to the changing industry dynamics and the positive customer feedback they received is a testament to that.

3. Microsoft

Microsoft enjoys a dominant position in desktop operating system market with 80% market share. Its software division is also doing well but it is dying a slow death in mobile operating system market. As competition from the likes of Apple and Amazon increase, Microsoft changed their strategy.

It all began when Satya Nadella took over the CEO role in 2014.  Microsoft shifted its focus from traditional software to the cloud-based solutions. The company took a U-turn and started forming partnerships with software and technology vendors, a move you did not expect from a company like Microsoft, especially, when you take their history into account.

Their stock prices went from $38 per share in 2014 to $139 in 2019 and their revenue soared from $93.5 billion to $122 billion. In fact, Microsoft became only the third company to join the prestigious $1 trillion market valuation club.

4.General Electric

By far the most interesting example of digital transformation comes from none other than General Electric. With a rich history spanning over 125 years and some of the big names such as Thomas Edison as its founding fathers, General Electric is one of the pioneers and one of the most iconic brands in electrical industry.

Unfortunately, they failed to live up to its name as the time passes and start to lose its touch. Thankfully, they decided to embrace 3D printing technology, which turn their fortunes around. It helped them to drastically cut down on transportation and storage costs General Electric has already produced 19 different airplane turbine parts by using 3D printing. After getting positive results from the 3D printing, they decided to pursue it for long term and planning to invest $3.5 billion.

5. DHL

DHL is well known for its excellent stock management and supply chain but that did not stop them from improving. Their stock management and supply chain systems are easy to use and automated, but they want to take things to the next level. For this they decided to team up with Ricoh and Ubimax to develop application for smart glasses. By pairing smart glasses with these applications, it can be used for reading bar codes, streamline pickup and drop off and reduce the chances of errors. Their stock price doubled from 20 euros in 2016 to 40 euros in 2018.

6. Best Buy

Best Buy was in the midst of a crisis in 2012 and some thought it will die soon. The situation was so bad the Best Buy employees did not believe that they could get out of this crisis and survive against Amazon. A new CEO combined with a new digital perspective proved to be a lifesaver for Best Buy.  In fact, they turned the company’s fortunes by improving the delivery times and enriching the lives of people with technology.

Soon, they launched a price matching program, which advised customers on which products they should buy instead of just selling it to them.

Best Buy also started offering in-home consultation for buyers who are not digitally literate and taught them how to use technology.

By using customer data at their disposal, they started offering customized recommendation and assistance.

All these moves helped them to triple their stock price from $23.70 in 2012 to $77 in 2018.

 

TaskQue can help you automate task allocation and other business processes through its intelligent task assignment process called Queue.

It follows a Software as a Service model, which can help you digitally transform your business.

 

For any feedback, please contact us: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

source: taskque

Some economists identify entrepreneurship as a factor of production because it can increase the productive efficiency of a firm.

Many different definitions of entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship exist, and most place entrepreneurs in the same critical category as more consistently identified factors of production.

For example, some economists define an entrepreneur as someone who utilizes the other factors – land, labor, and capital – for profit. Other definitions consider entrepreneurship in a more abstract way – entrepreneurs identify new opportunities among the other factors without necessarily controlling them.

Since disruptive innovations are the result of human insight, it is not entirely clear that entrepreneurship should be considered a separate factor of production from labor.

Economists disagree about whether entrepreneurs are different from laborers, are a subset of laborers or whether they can be both simultaneously.

Risk and the Entrepreneur

One of the least developed aspects of mainstream microeconomics is the theory of the entrepreneur. The 18th-century economist Richard Cantillon called entrepreneurs a "special, risk-bearing group of people." Since that time, risk-bearing has been an important characteristic of the economic entrepreneur.

Later economists such as Jean-Baptiste Say and Frank Knight believed market risk was the crucial element of the entrepreneur. It wasn't until the middle of the 20th century when Joseph Schumpeter and Israel Kirzner independently developed comprehensive applications of risk-bearing in a productive framework.

Schumpeter noted that the other factors of production required a coordinating mechanism to be economically useful. He also believed that profits and interest only exist in a dynamic setting where there is economic development. According to Schumpeter, development takes place when creative individuals come up with new combinations of the factors of production. Schumpeter argued that entrepreneurs created dynamism and growth.

Value and Returns

Some economists define the factors of production as those inputs that generate value and receive returns. Labor generates value and receives wages as payment for work.

Capital receives interest as payment for its use.

Land receives rents as payment for its use. It is the entrepreneur, according to this theory, that receives profit.

This theory clearly differentiates between the laborer and the entrepreneur based on the type of return.

There are some important challenges to this view. For example, do entrepreneurs receive profit commensurate with their marginal revenue product? Is there a definable market for entrepreneurship that corresponds to its returns, and corresponds with an upward-sloping supply curve?

Entrepreneurs and Asset Ownership

These issues beg another question: Does an entrepreneur necessarily need access to economic assets? Some economists say no – it's ideas that matter. This is sometimes known as the pure entrepreneur. Per this theory, entrepreneurial acts are non-marginal and purely intellectual.

Others disagree, since only an owner of assets can expose them to risk. This view assumes that entrepreneurship is embodied in the creation and operation of a firm and the deployment of the other factors.

Austrian economist Peter Klein says that if entrepreneurship is treated as a process or attribute – not an employment category – it cannot be treated as a factor of production. Normal factors of production can be depreciated during times of economic struggle. This doesn't apply to attributes, however.

Compete Risk Free with $100,000 in Virtual Cash

Put your trading skills to the test with our FREE Stock Simulator. Compete with thousands of Investopedia traders and trade your way to the top! Submit trades in a virtual environment before you start risking your own money. Practice trading strategies so that when you're ready to enter the real market, you've had the practice you need.

source:investopedia


investopedia

When it comes to digital transformation it’s no longer a question of if you should do it, but when. According to global market intelligence firm IDC, 85% of enterprise decision makers say they have plans to embark on a digital transformation within the next two years, with more than a third (37%) saying they’ve already started executing one and nearly half (45%) saying they’re in the early stages of adopting one.

Investments back this, with funding of digital transformation worldwide topping $1.2 trillion in 2019, up 18% from the previous year. With the ability to increase revenue, reduce operational costs, and provide enhanced experiences for both staff and customers, investing in a digital-first strategy seems like the best course to take. 

Despite this, only 3% of enterprises complete their digital transformation projects, most attributing failure to either a fear of change, lack of cloud resources, or lack of agility. But by looking at the explosive growth in the automation space — 100% YoY for RPA and 72% YoY for iPaaS, for example — it’s clear what role automation will play in the digital enterprise. Investing in a pervasive automation strategy and a related platform that provides end-to-end solutions is crucial to breaking through the noise and succeeding in any transformative efforts.

There will, of course, be a learning curve when implementing such a strategy, but many organizations have no idea how to start – or where to start – and what immediate value (if any) they will receive once they adopt such a platform. Here’s what we see working for enterprises today when it comes to an automation strategy.

Overcoming the Initial Barriers of Digital Transformation

Forward-thinking enterprises recognize that in order to remain competitive, they must continuously evolve their culture, processes, data and technologies – and this won’t be easy.

Though 83% of IT decision makers say workflow automation is essential to digital transformation, a large number of manual processes still remain active in many companies.  

Unfortunately, even the most dedicated IT teams can’t manage the optimization of thousands upon thousands of processes across the business.

Because of this, only certain processes will get prioritized for automation, meaning only a small number of users will reap the benefits.

For example, workflows critical to keeping the lights on will always be prioritized, while processes in lines of business (LOB) including HRfinance and marketing that could drastically improve with automation may sit on the backburner. This results in an increasing number of inefficiencies across business. 

Automation Platforms that can be used by non-coders like Business Systems teams, analysts, and App Admins democratizes the process of integration and automation. This is key to actually achieving Digital Transformation goals: when bottlenecks prevent progress and automation projects are not agile, there is no way an organization can transform at scale.

Is the Platform Flexible and Secure?

The key to enterprise-wide adoption of automation is that it should be something that can be used by both your IT team and other players like business systems, app admins, MarketingOps, and SalesOps teams. Spreading this skill set out across groups is the only way to scale. However, you still need to ensure that the platform has enterprise security and governance capabilities.

The IT team and security team should be able to monitor everyone’s activity on a single platform.

On the business side, employees often want to use the tool they prefer for their job function.

While IT/business systems teams will want to ensure the tool fits in well with their infrastructure, LOBs will often drive tech purchases without their oversight. To avoid conflict, it’s best to invest in an automation platform that is agile enough to enable LOB to choose whatever technology and tools they prefer.

This, combined with an emphasis of time-to-value or an ability to build agile integrations quickly, makes a no-code solution the best choice. 

 

Early-Stage Digital Transformation

Once a tool is selected, there are several steps you must take in the first stage of adoption to ensure your investment doesn’t go dead in the water, according to HubSpot:

  • Use cases: The decision makers of your team now must identify what use cases they want to implement first. Consider the processes across your business that could use the most help — is it Order-to-Cash or Employee Onboarding and Offboarding? Could your organization use a virtual helpdesk to answer employee inquiries upon command, led by a bot-based protocol which uses ML to improve based on the feedback it receives? Whatever they decide, the right (and wrong) use cases must be identified at the very beginning, which may take a few trials given the amount you have.
  • Change management – Part 1: Automation is going to change the way you work drastically, which is different from the typical business-as-usual (BAU) change management. Therefore, it may be necessary to involve additional planning and implementation tools to ensure a smooth transition. The first step should be examining the extent or degree to which change can occur with said adoption. 
  • Operations & IT strategy: When testing the functionality of a tool, it needs to be able to support the load of several use cases (hence the selection of use cases in a previous bullet). This will help gauge what’s necessary for scaling in the future and help build an infrastructure for your platform. 

Mid-Stage Digital Transformation

At this point in your digital-first, automation-driven strategy, at least one use case should be actively in production. Now, the hard work begins.

  • Cost-benefit analysis – Part 1: Your initial use case(s) will help determine high level/unnecessary costs in the first year of your program. This analysis will be refined later in an integration “playbook.”
  • Gap assessment – Part 1: By using automation to eliminate manual, repetitive work, you’ll quickly see areas of improvement for other processes prior to applying automation. It’s best to consult with your IT/business systems team and designated LOBs to determine how to reengineer these processes before applying automation.
  • Integration playbook: Building upon your initial use case(s), you will need to deploy a large-scale integration playbook across LOBs and/or timelines. This will allow projection into your pipeline, and act as a primary input into your second cost-benefit analysis.
  • Cost-benefit analysis – Part 2: As you build upon use cases, you will continue to identify unnecessary costs, lessons learned, and value received versus expectations. Continue to apply this knowledge as adoption continues, marking it for any future implementations.

Growth Stage of a Digital Transformation

At this point, you will have several use cases in deployment that lack enterprise cohesiveness. Here’s what to do next:

  • Gap assessment – Part 2: If there are any reengineering techniques you’ve found successful at this point, now’s the time to apply them. This would also be the time to identify any other areas of improvement to ensure your automation footprint is sound. 
  • Power user program – Part 1: The power users, in this case, will be non-technical staff. Sure, IT and business systems need to be able to use the platform, but it’s the extent to which LOBs and other non-technical staff use the platform that’ll make the case for this clear.
  • Identify a few LOB champions and assess how to scale and reduce costs based on their usage.
  • Scaling IT: At the Growth stage, you will have learned enough to be able to make informed decisions that significantly impact cost, such as the use of on-prem versus cloud systems. 
  • Change management – Part 2: In adopting an automation platform that changes the way you work, you will impact every customer, employee and department in your business. Be prepared to launch any change management plans at this point, preparing your enterprise for transformation.
  • Power user program – Part 2: As you begin to transition developers and LOB users, you will start to iron out the kinks of your platform. This is necessary before establishing a center of excellence (CoE) or distributing the platform as an end-user computing (EUC) model for the larger enterprise.

Mature Stage of a Digital Transformation

By now, your platform has completed development and you have a centralized program ready to scale. At this point, you’ll want to implement:

  • Portfolio management of best practices: Your integration “playbook” is now mature. You will have experienced enough refinements, shifts, and digital transformation on a scale that requires you to apply business intelligence. We recommend getting ahead of the game and investing in warehouse tools like Snowflake and visualization tools like Tableau and integrating them into your platform.
  • Modernize IT: As technology changes, so do the available options for automation support. Your company may have since moved to a cloud platform, leaving on-prem systems in the past. Be sure to integrate (or determine the availability of integration) of any new apps or processes.
  • Thought leadership: When your business is ready to perform in a new way both internally and externally, this presents an opportunity to reach out to a matured network to leverage the best practices of others. Implementing a seasoned approach, or using it to validate your own, is a necessary last step in becoming a truly intelligent enterprise.

source: .workato

 

Completing digital transformation initiatives can place organizations well above others in the industry, according to an Avanade report.

Digital transformation is undoubtedly a priority for business leaders, with 66% of leaders saying they have plans for a digital business transformation, according to a recent Gartner report. However, only 11% of leaders admitted to achieving the transformation at scale, Gartner found. 

While reaching that level of success with a digital transformation is difficult, the payoff is well worth it. Companies that have successful digital transformation initiatives can expect to see a 17% return on investment (ROI) over the next year, according to an Avanade report. 

The report, conducted by Vanson Bourne, surveyed 1,150 global decision-makers to gain insight into the various impacts of digital transformation in the enterprise. 

Almost all respondents (96%) said they have a digital transformation strategy in their companies, the report found. However, 43% of professionals said their organizations are becoming fatigued by the digital transformation efforts, resulting in fewer completed projects. 

This fatigue is a result of many factors, the report found.

Some 46% cited hiring and training people in the skills as the biggest challenge, while 35% said they are struggling to modernize legacy systems. 

Regardless of the obstacles, organizations expect digital transformation projects to reduce costs by 10%, increase productivity by 11%, and increase business growth by 10%, according to the report. 

Some 83% of respondents said employee engagement, and customer experience solutions should have equal priority when planning these initiatives; and 88% agree that integrating innovation into business systems is necessary for agility and continued improvement.

source: techrepublic

 

Last month the World Bank released its flagship World Development Report entitled “Digital Dividends”.

The report is appealing because it does more than simply celebrate all the ways that digital technology has made the world a better place.

It also laments and warns against outcomes where the digital economy becomes divisive and exclusionary.

Unlike Professor Pangloss in Voltaire’s Candide, the World Bank does not believe that all is for the best in the best of all possible worlds. While few would argue with the good news, the less good news is often not so well understood.

First the good news. According to the report, more than 40 per cent of humanity has access to the internet.

Internet use has tripled from 1 billion to 3.2 billion people just in the last decade. Mobile phones are owned by more people in the poorest households than those that have running water, electricity and modern sanitation.

The digital economy has connected people, business and governments in multiple ways, creating a host of new production opportunities, expanded consumer choice, and the scope for entrepreneurship and self-employment.

Small enterprises with very few personnel can reach numerous customers in any number of locations through internet platforms.

As the report emphasises, at its best information and communications technology is a source of growth via increased trading opportunities, productivity, competition and employment.

Among the drivers of increased trade are lower transactions and capital costs, improved information flows, and product and process innovations.

Digitisation and the development of algorithms to perform routine tasks increase productivity.

Lower entry costs and more readily available information foster competition, which in turn spurs innovation.

Direct employment in information and communications technology activities does not involve large numbers, but activities enabled by it create many more jobs.

It has been estimated that each information and communications technology job in the United States creates five additional jobs. In China, the e-commerce sector has reputedly generated 10 million jobs in related services, accounting for 1.3 per cent of overall employment.

Dozens of governments have developed e-government platforms, with facilities for interactive communication.

These can be used to transact regulatory obligations, disseminate information, and communicate with citizens for a variety of purposes.

All this suggests that the digital economy is a valuable vehicle for development and one that reduces inequality in a world where inequality is on the increase.

But not necessarily so, according to the World Bank.

While the digital economy can have all the positive benefits enumerated above, the absence of what the World Bank calls an analogue policy foundation means that reality lags behind the promise.

If 40 per cent of the population has access to internet, it follows that 60 per cent does not. They are excluded and further marginalised precisely because of the rich opportunities offered by digital technology. What is needed to address exclusion, argues the World Bank, is a sound business climate, adequate human capital, and good governance.

The economics of the internet suggest a tendency towards monopoly, not so much in the case of hardware, but with software platforms such as Google and Amazon.

The sources of potential monopolistic power reside in incumbency advantages linked to information, economies of scale and lock-in effects linked to complex customised operating environments.

Vested interests, a poor regulatory environment and bad governance can sustain and reinforce these barriers to entry. Labour-saving technology can reduce employment opportunities. Lagging or underfunded education hampers skill development, intensifying the struggle between capacity and technological sophistication.

Technology then further emphasises skill differentials and deepens inequality.

As for e-government, the same exclusions based on digital access and skill levels arise.

Another problem in some jurisdictions is linked to the quality of governance. Instead of serving the citizenry, the personal information requirements needed for digital interaction can be used for control and repression.

Nobody is arguing for arresting the progress of the digital economy or that its huge benefits should be compromised. Rather, the argument is that the benefits fall short because policy failures mean they are poorly shared.

Source: scmp

 

WEF: Dubai shows the way to growth in Middle East

Emirate a global magnet for international firms, helping transform plans and ideas to reality

The only way for the Middle East to address economic challenges is to open up an economy like Dubai, which has set an example and showed the world how to achieve sustainable growth despite geopolitical and financial headwinds that the region faced over the past decades, minsters and private sector executives said at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos.

At Davos, Sheikh Hamdan bin Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Crown Prince of Dubai and Chairman of the Dubai Executive Council, met Apple CEO Tim Cook and Cisco CEO Chuck Robbins, where the Crown Prince affirmed that the UAE and Dubai's experiments present a model for development and offer an incubator for innovation and technology.

He said Dubai became a global magnet for international companies and entrepreneurs as the emirate offers good opportunities to help business leaders to transform their plans and ideas to reality.

Sheikh Hamdan also attended the signing of an agreement to establish the Emirates Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution in the UAE. The agreement was signed by Mohammad bin Abdullah Al Gergawi, Minister of Cabinet Affairs and the Future, vice-chairman of the board of trustees and managing director of Dubai Future; and Professor Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the WEF.

Mohammad Al Tuwaijri, Saudi Arabia's Minister of Economy and Planning, said Dubai has set an example for the Arab world on how to achieve growth despite political, economic and financial headwinds.

"Talking about practical solutions for the region, if I take Dubai as an example, they started their [growth] journey in late-80s and I can't count negative events that took place in the region during this period from the Gulf war to Asia crisis and oil volatility," he said. "Yet, Dubai is here, growing and showing the world an example what it could achieve. Dubai has established a role model and has done a great job."

Alain Bejjani, CEO of Majid Al Futtaim, said solutions of economic problems for the Arab world will come only from the private sector and regional governments should open up their economies just like Dubai.

"The only solution for the region is to open up the economy - just like Dubai. The private sector in Middle East countries will come and invest. We know what are the investment opportunities; the government doesn't need to tell us. Put aside Saudi Arabia and the UAE, there is no government in the Arab world that has ability to deal its issues on its own," Bejjani said during a panel discussion.

According to Dubai FDI figures, Dubai remains a magnet for global foreign investors, especially in new-age sectors such as e-commerce, AI, blockchain and fintech, as the emirate recorded a 26 per cent increase in foreign direct investment (FDI) in the first half of 2018, reaching Dh17.7 billion. The number of FDI projects surged 40 per cent year-on-year to 248 during H1 2018, reflecting growing confidence in the emirate's economy and its policies. Backed by accelerated government spending prior to Expo 2020 Dubai, the International Monetary Fund had predicted Dubai's economy to expand 3.3 per cent in 2018 and 4.1 per cent in 2019.

The Saudi minister also pointed out that the UAE and Saudi Arabia are working hard to ease and digitise cross-border trade and remove barriers.

"Recent joint efforts with the UAE are significant that two countries can sit down and agree on very specific targets, measures where they can show the world how and issues can be resolved. For example, between the UAE and Saudi Arabia, we decided that borders will be easier, digitised and quicker accessibility of trucks, etc. Instead of taking more than 72 hours, they will hopefully take three to four hours," Al Tuwaijri said.

He hoped that other regional countries will join the UAE and Saudi Arabia when they see this model working.

"We want to establish a reference for others to follow. If two big nations with big GDPs succeed, I think we will have a better chance and opportunity."

Bejjani said after Dubai and Abu Dhabi, vision 2030 by Saudi Arabia has been a whiff of fresh air.

"What is happening between the UAE and Saudi Arabia is exemplary. If this [removal of trade barriers] becomes reality and it is moving fairly at quite a rapid pace, the private sector we will invest in the Arab world," he added.

He said scale and global relevance and competitiveness are the two biggest problems when it comes to entrepreneurship, startups or corporates in the Arab world.

"During the past century, some of our countries gained independence and some were formed. And we have been working ingeniously on making sure that we put barriers across the Arab world. And the reality is that we have a market that is as big as most of largest markets in the world such as Western Europe and the US; but we are not smart enough to work together... We didn't do enough and if we want to promote innovation and promote growth we need to give market to the people who want to invest in it," Bejjani said during the panel discussion.

Citing examples of San Francisco and Palo Alto, he said Silicon Valley exists not because that people born there were smarter but simply because they have good education system and have market.

Source: zawya

 

 
Middle East Business
 
At a Roundtable event in Nairobi, Ministers from across Africa sat together with investors and the private sector to determine how best to tackle the investment and credit risk hurdles in order to make African risks bankable. Participants to the Roundtable see the event as timely because it comes at time of geopolitical uncertainties which, according to The World Bank, could lead to “higher borrowing costs or cut off capital flows to emerging and frontier markets”.

For African governments part of what is at stake are much needed foreign direct investments and access to affordable financing necessary to spur development and, specifically, to close the estimated USD900 billion infrastructure gap. Equally, the private sector stands to lose billions of dollars in lost opportunities if the requirements for a favourable investment environment are not adequately addressed.

The half day forum, the 4th Roundtable to focus on Political and Credit Risks in Africa, took place on the side lines of the African Trade Insurance Agency’s (ATI) (www.ATI-ACA.org) Annual General Meetings. The event opened with pointed remarks from H.E. Patrice Talon, President of Benin:

« Le partenariat public-privé s’impose donc comme la réponse aux besoins d’investissement structurants de nos États. Se présente alors la nécessité de disposer d’outils appropriés permettant des investissements malgré la persistance de la perception de risque élevé en Afrique. Dans ce contexte, l’assurance-crédit constitue entre autres un outil efficace pour répondre à ce défi. »

Subsequent discussions focused on possible solutions to the challenges facing governments from the private sector and export credit agencies from panellists such as:

  • Hon. Patrick Chinamasa, Minister of Finance & Economic Development, Zimbabwe
  • Hon. Romuald Wadagni, Minister of Economy & Finance, Benin
  • Hon Felix Mutati, Minister of Finance, Zambia
  • Chamsou Andjorin, Director Government Affairs & Market Development, Boeing Intl.
  • Helen Mtshali, Syndication Lead – Sub-Saharan Africa, Industrial Finance Solutions, GE
  • Nisrin Hala, Sr. Director, Global Trade Finance Bus. Devpt. Emerging Markets, SMBC

Investors are not immune to political and social developments in emerging regions like Africa. In fact, with reduced earnings – the benchmark emerging-market stock index has lost approximately 4 percent annually since 2010 from a high of 22 percent annual return in the preceding decade – investors are now focusing on more than the bottom line in these markets. During the boom years of the last two decades, Africa was experiencing unprecedented GDP growth rates but depressed commodity prices have seen growth in the sub-Saharan Africa region slow to 1.5 percent rate in 2016. According to World Bank estimates, oil exporters account for most of the slowdown owing to their two-thirds contribution to regional output.

In a Bloomberg article published in March 2016, emerging market investors from some of the most prominent companies noted the dramatic change in their investing tactics due to global fragility, which they see as unveiling institutional weakness, corruption, poor governance and efficiencies. In this current climate, investors are now keenly tracking social indicators such as corruption rankings, gender parity and the extent that rule of law is respected within emerging markets.

“Africa is in a period of realignment in this new global order but I don’t think anyone should bet against its resilience. We are still home to some of the fastest growing economies in the world – as of 2017, the World Economic Forum ranks Côte d’Ivoire, Tanzania and Senegal on the list of the top ten fastest growing economies in the world,” notes George Otieno, ATI’s CEO.

In this climate, it is more imperative than ever for African governments to focus on economic diversity to maintain growth while addressing risks to investors. As an internationally respected African institution, the African Trade Insurance Agency (ATI) offers the ideal solution precisely because the company has strong relationships with governments and because its risk assessments and mitigation solutions are seen as credible by global financiers and investors. With ATI involved in a transaction, governments are able to provide security to investors and suppliers against a range of investment risks.

In 2016, ATI insured close to USD2 billion (KES202.8 billion) worth of trade and investments and the company is increasingly supporting some of the continent’s most important transactions such as Ethiopian Airline’s fleet expansion and a USD660 million investment in Lake Turkana, Africa’s largest wind farm and, to date, the single largest investment in Kenya.

In this environment, ATI’s products are being seen as a valuable tool to enable lenders to take sub-investment grade risk in Africa thus allowing governments and corporates to access more affordable financing. Importantly, in its role as an investment insurer of last resort, ATI is also providing the necessary comfort to support continued investments into the continent amidst a period of uncertainty.


http://middleeast-business.com

 

 

War is costly. Not only in lives lost, towns destroyed, nations split or whole continents in turmoil, but in the massive amounts spent on weaponry and mercenaries/fighters.

In the Middle East, the cost is all too apparent. Many once great cities stand in ruins, historic monuments and mosques razed to the ground.  But who profits from war? And why isn’t such an enormous amount of money invested in peacemaking initiatives?

 

Middle East Magazine

 

The latest Global Peace Index report, published by the Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP), found that 2015 was a bad year for international peace and security, recording a further deterioration in global peace based on historic trends.

Globally, 2015 witnessed the highest number of global battle deaths for 25 years, persistently high levels of terrorism, and the highest number of refugees and displaced people since World War II.

This violence had a huge cost. The report finds that for 2015 alone, the economic impact of violence to the global economy was $13.6 trillion in terms of purchasing power parity (PPP). This is equivalent to $5 per day for every person on the planet, or 11 times the size of global foreign direct investment (FDI).

The toll of violence is typically counted in terms of its human and emotional cost, but the financial damage to the economy is yet another additional factor to consider. When counting the economic impact one must look at the costs of preventing and containing violence, as well as measuring its consequences. This is important because spending on containing violence, while perhaps necessary, is fundamentally economically unproductive.

 

How do you quantify the costs of war?

IEP’s method is a comprehensive accounting exercise to “add up” those direct and indirect expenditures related to creating and containing violence plus its consequential costs. These include not just military spending but domestic expenditures on security and police plus the losses from armed conflict, homicides, violent crime and sexual assault.

The $13.6 trillion of expenditures and losses represent 13.3% of world GDP. To break this figure down, it’s the equivalent of $1,876 for every person on the planet. The numbers refer to the current expenditures and their estimated associated effects in 2015, and are represented in PPP international dollars.

 

These numbers are notable for two reasons.

Firstly, over 70% of the economic impact of violence accrues from what is mostly government spending on the military and internal security. This shows that significant amounts of government expenditure are tied up to this end. In a perfectly peaceful world, these huge resources could be directed elsewhere.

Secondly, the remaining amount is consequential losses from violence and conflict and these, too, are enormous. They significantly outweigh the international community’s spending on building peace.

A quick examination of the numbers reveals that the world continues to spend vastly disproportionate resources on creating and containing violence compared to what it spends on peace. In 2015 alone, UN peacekeeping expenditures of $8.27 billion totalled only 1.1% of the estimated $742 billion of economic losses from armed conflict.

When looking at peace-building – the activities that aim to create peace in the long term – those totaled $6.8 billion or only 0.9% the economic losses from conflict. Spending on peace-building and peace-keeping is minuscule when compared to the economic losses caused by conflict, representing just 2% in 2015.

But fundamental to future improvements in peace is a greater investment in peace-building and peace-keeping. Peace-keeping operations are measures aimed at responding to a conflict, whereas peace-building expenditures are aimed at developing and maintaining the capacities for resilience to conflict.

Peace-building expenditure aims to reduce the risk of lapsing or relapsing into violent conflict by strengthening national capacities and institutions for conflict management and laying the foundations of sustainable peace and development.

These numbers suggest a serious under-investment in the activities that build peace and demonstrate that the international community is spending too much on conflict and too little on peace. Given the fact that the cost of violence is so significant, the economic argument for more spending on peace is indeed powerful.

 

The rise of peace inequality

Furthermore, a new phenomenon is emerging as some countries grow more peaceful while overall levels of violence increase: peace inequality. This drives a broader dynamic of greater economic inequalities between nations; as the least peaceful countries spiral into greater violence and conflict, they are also further set back economically.

 

Weapons of war – Middle East imports increasing

According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), Asia and the Middle East are leading a rise in arms imports, whilst the USA and Russia remain the largest global arms exporters.

Arms imports by states in the Middle East rose by 61% between 2006–10 and
2011–15.

 

Pieter Wezeman, Senior Researcher with the SIPRI Arms and Military Expenditure Programme, says; ‘Despite low oil prices, large deliveries of arms to the Middle East are scheduled to continue as part of contracts signed in the past five years.’ The civil wars raging in Yemen, Syria and Iraq, are all contributing to the proliferation of arms on the streets of the Middle East.


War costs us $13.6 trillion globally. So why spend so little on peace? 2017, Middle East News.
middleeast-business.com

|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

 

According to the data from Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), world military expenditure in 2000, was estimated to be around $1132 billion, whilst in 2014, this estimation increased to about $1746 billion. For the most part, these figures are due to the large military budgets of the Americas and Europe.

 

Source: Data from Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI)

* Arab countries include: Algeria, Libya, Morocco, Tunisia, Djibouti, Somalia, Sudan, Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, UAE, Yemen.

 

Similarly, military expenditure data from Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) show that military costs in the Arab world increased from about $62 billion in 1990 to about $134 billion in 2015. This comparative difference is significant when put into Iran or Switzerland’s context, but in terms of military expenditure for the USA, this cost expansion is minimal. Evidently, the USA raised its military finances from about $555 billion in 1990 to around $596 billion in 2015. An excessive growth, matched by no other.

 

Source: Calculations depending on data from Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI)

* Arab countries include: Algeria, Libya, Morocco, Tunisia, Djibouti, Somalia, Sudan, Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, UAE, Yemen.

 

Source: Data from Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI)

* Arab countries include: Algeria, Libya, Morocco, Tunisia, Djibouti, Somalia, Sudan, Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, UAE, Yemen.

 

The following table shows data on military expenditure in the Arab world compared to the other main actors in constant (2014) US$ million and as percentage of gross domestic product for the period 1988-2015.

 

 1. Data for 2008, 2. data for 2006, 3. data for 2000, 4. data for 2010.

Source: Data from Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI)

* Arab countries include: Algeria, Libya, Morocco, Tunisia, Djibouti, Somalia, Sudan, Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, UAE, Yemen.

 

Cost of conflict for the Middle East

A report by Strategic Foresight Group has calculated the conflict opportunity cost for the Middle East from 1991-2010 at a whopping $12 trillion. Had there been peace in the region, Lebanon’s share during this period would be almost $100 billion (according to 2006 prices). In other words had there been peace and cooperation since 1991, every Lebanese citizen would be earning over $11,000 instead of the $5,600 in 2010.

 

 

By Soukaina Rachidi

According to recent forecasts from the International Monetary Fund, the GDP of the six oil-reliant members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), Qatar, Oman, Kuwait, U.A.E, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia are projected to slow to 2.7% in 2016, down from 3.2% in 2015.  The main cause for this slowed growth is the historically low oil prices, which have weakened the fiscal balances of Gulf’ oil-exporters and resulted in unprecedented budget deficits for the first time in 20 years.

With increased oil yields from Russia, Africa, the Caspian Sea and the re-introduction of Iran into the global oil market, the GCC has had to deal with an increasing number of competitors. However, this increase isn’t the only challenge facing the GCC. The growing interest in renewable energy has also resulted in a steady decline in the demand for oil. However, while oil prices are unlikely to rise anytime soon, The GCC’s substantial sovereign wealth funds and foreign reserves are sure to protect it from any economic shocks in the foreseeable future.

Marie Owens Thomsen, Chief Economist at Indosuez Wealth Management, believes that low oil prices are presenting the GCC with a unique opportunity to introduce structural reforms and fiscal policies that will diversify its economies, increase investment and create more sustainable business opportunities for the region. Here are three new emerging industries that investors should consider in the GCC.

 

1. Halal Lifestyle Industry

A recent report published by the Economist Intelligence Unit predicted that the Gulf’s Halal food imports are projected to increase to 53.1 billion dollars by 2020 and by the end of the decade, the UAE’s annual Halal food imports alone are expected to reach an estimated 8.4 billion dollars. While the GCC has lagged in developing the Islamic economy in the past, these projections are changing the landscape of the region’s economy. The UAE is currently leading the charge, as it primes Dubai to become the future hub of Islamic banking, Halal food and lifestyle industries.

By leading the world in the standardization of halal accreditation and certification, Dubai hopes to attract new industry-specific manufacturing and services to the region. In addition to that, the UAE is also targeting the halal tourism market, which represents 11.6% of global tourism expenditure and is projected to be worth 238 billion dollars by 2019. With the rapidly growing global Muslim population and an emerging middle class, the GCC has the potential to generate great revenue serving the needs of this growing market segment.

 

2. Aviation Industry

The lack of other efficient modes of transportation in the GCC has played a big role in fueling the demand for better airlines, airports and aviation services in the region. According to the International Air Transport Association (IATA), the Middle East is anticipated to be one of the fastest growing regions in the world in terms of passenger traffic until at least 2034, with an annual growth rate of 4.6% on average. Over the past couple of years, the GCC has implemented various progressive aviation policies to increase transparency and promote competitiveness in the sector to encourage further growth.

The fact that roughly 80% of the world's population lives within an eight-hour flight of the GCC has also presented a great advantage to the region’s aviation sector. While airlines like Qatar Airways, Etihad and Emirates lead the market in long-haul flights, smaller low-cost carriers like FlyDubai and Air Arabia are filling the gap in the short-haul market. The GCC’s clear geographic advantage, the rise in tourism, growing populations and the ready access to capital, fuel and space make the Gulf’s aviation industry a strong investment opportunity for investors seeking to capitalize on the privatization of airports and existing gaps in the domestic travel market.

 

3. Entrepreneurship Industry

While political turmoil and lower oil prices have adversely impacted many sectors in the region, the GCC’s start-up ecosystem continues to flourish. In fact, in 2015, the Dubai Department of Economic Development issued an estimated 22,025 trade licenses, which is almost double the number issued in 2009. Despite the additional regulatory challenges that entrepreneurs face in the GCC, such as restrictive visa regulations or the lack of bankruptcy laws, the region still remains an attractive hub for startups founders.  Dubai Department of Economic Development has risen steadily during the past eight years, after a dip in 2009, when the global financial crisis hit the region. Last year, Dubai DED issued 22,025 trade licences, up from 11,743 in 2009.business category.The number of trade licences issued by Dubai Department of Economic Development has risen steadily during the past eight years, after a dip in 2009, when the global financial crisis hit the region. Last year, Dubai DED issued 22,025 trade licences, up from 11,743 in 2009.

According to Dany Farha, the Chief Executive of Dubai-based Beco ­Capital, the GCC’s tech startup sector has grown ten-fold in the past four years. The growth of the regional venture capital ecosystem and the falling demand for office space and the willingness of suppliers to negotiate prices has created the “perfect storm” for small businesses to grow and reduce overhead costs. Furthermore, the privatization of various public services across the GCC, has created a unique opportunity for investors to diversify their portfolios and help entrepreneurs provide more efficient and cost-effective services for GCC governments’ and consumers.  

Par Sami ben Mansour

Dans un contexte économique de crise pour l’Union Européenne, la Suisse semble tirer son épingle du jeu. Certains observateurs dont François Garçon, universitaire et auteur du livre "Le modèle suisse" n’hésitent pas à parler de « miracle suisse ».

Pour ce fin observateur de l’économie et de la société suisses, ce pays est un modèle à suivre dont la force repose sur le dynamisme exceptionnel de ses PME, un système de formation excellent, une élite politique tournée vers l’économie et une gouvernance démocratique populaire qui a des préoccupations économiques parfois pointues.

Une économie vigoureuse portée par des PME dynamiques

En 2014, le taux de croissance économique de la Suisse a bondi à 2%. Plus du double de la croissance de la zone Euro qui n’a pas dépassé 0,9%. A démographie égale, le PIB suisse est deux fois supérieur à celui de la France. Il est également 30% supérieur à celui de l’Allemagne, l’économie la plus puissante de l’Europe. Le chômage (3%) est très faible en Suisse qui affiche aussi l'un des taux de chômage des jeunes entre 15-24 ans (3,6%) les plus bas de monde.

L’économie suisse repose sur des secteurs comme la pharmacie, la chimie, la mécanique de précision, l’horlogerie, et l’industrie alimentaire à haute valeur ajoutée, tous tirés par l’exportation. Le miracle suisse ce sont les PME qui représentent la majorité du tissu industriel.

Un système de formation performant centré sur les métiers

A la fin de la scolarité obligatoire, 70% des jeunes optent pour l’apprentissage dual. Il s’agit d’une filière d’excellence. Les 30% restants se dirigent vers le système universitaire suisse qui compte la seule université d’Europe continentale dans les 30 premiers du classement de Shanghai. Les universités suisses sont fortement cosmopolites : 28% des étudiants sont étrangers [1].

Des élites suisses à forte culture économique

Si la Suisse est business friendly c’est aussi grâce à son personnel politique, composé principalement de petits entrepreneurs, d’agriculteurs, de professions libérales, d’économistes… La Suisse a également adopté la culture économique de l’ « utilisateur-payeur ». Les citoyens se voient plutôt comme des contribuables et les électeurs sont ainsi particulièrement plus vigilants face aux politiques. Il n’est donc pas rare que les électeurs votent, par réalisme économique, pour l’augmentation des impôts pour financer l’amélioration de leur qualité de vie ou pour l’annulation de projets jugés inutiles pour baisser les charges publiques.

Une démocratie directe qui se préoccupe d’économie

La pétition est la pièce maîtresse de l’initiative populaire qui permet aux citoyens suisses de se prononcer aussi souvent qu’ils le souhaitent sur les questions qu’ils estiment importantes. Et l’économie en est une. En 2013, les suisses ont voté à 68% contre les rémunérations abusives des dirigeants d’entreprise.

 

[1] Office fédéral de la statistique

About Us

Enjoy the power of entrepreneurs' platform offering comprehensive economic information on the Arab world and Switzerland, with databases on various economic issues, mainly Swiss-Arab trade statistics, a platform linking international entrepreneurs and decision makers. Become member and be part of international entrepreneurs' network, where business and pleasure meet.

 

 

Contact Us

Please contact us : 

Cogestra Laser SA

144, route du Mandement 

1242 Satigny - Geneva

Switzerland

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.